North Macedonia vs Senegal: Ammonia, anhydrous — Export quantity
Ammonia, anhydrous — Export quantity over time
- North Macedonia
- Senegal
How they compare
Senegal currently reports 2.64 t against 2.48 t in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.16 t.
That makes Senegal's figure about 1.1 times North Macedonia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Senegal ahead.
North Macedonia ranks 79th and Senegal ranks 78th of 97 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, North Macedonia averaged higher in 1 and Senegal in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.12 t | 376.9 t | 374.78 t | Senegal |
| 2010s | 5.75 t | 52.29 t | 46.53 t | Senegal |
| 2020s | 2.4 t | 1.54 t | 0.86 t | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — export quantity, North Macedonia or Senegal?
- Senegal, at 2.64 t against 2.48 t in North Macedonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — export quantity between North Macedonia and Senegal?
- 0.16 t, with Senegal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Senegal?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do North Macedonia and Senegal rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — export quantity?
- North Macedonia ranks 79th and Senegal ranks 78th of 97 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf