Australia vs Libya: Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value over time
- Australia
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports 200,765 1000 USD against 109,936 1000 USD in Australia, a difference of 90,829 1000 USD.
That makes Libya's figure about 1.8 times Australia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Libya ahead.
Australia ranks 15th and Libya ranks 12th of 97 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Libya in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 60,248 1000 USD | 59,720 1000 USD | 527.44 1000 USD | Australia |
| 2010s | 166,036 1000 USD | 44,291 1000 USD | 121,746 1000 USD | Australia |
| 2020s | 125,942 1000 USD | 146,598 1000 USD | 20,656 1000 USD | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — export value, Australia or Libya?
- Libya, at 200,765 1000 USD against 109,936 1000 USD in Australia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — export value between Australia and Libya?
- 90,829 1000 USD, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Libya?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Australia and Libya rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — export value?
- Australia ranks 15th and Libya ranks 12th of 97 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf