Bangladesh vs Spain: Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value over time
- Bangladesh
- Spain
How they compare
Spain currently reports 25,239 1000 USD against 16,148 1000 USD in Bangladesh, a difference of 9,091 1000 USD.
That makes Spain's figure about 1.6 times Bangladesh's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Bangladesh ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 27th and Spain ranks 24th of 103 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 2 and Spain in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33,619 1000 USD | 11,102 1000 USD | 22,517 1000 USD | Bangladesh |
| 2010s | 14,879 1000 USD | 39,215 1000 USD | 24,336 1000 USD | Spain |
| 2020s | 30,484 1000 USD | 29,960 1000 USD | 523.34 1000 USD | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — export value, Bangladesh or Spain?
- Spain, at 25,239 1000 USD against 16,148 1000 USD in Bangladesh as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — export value between Bangladesh and Spain?
- 9,091 1000 USD, with Spain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Spain?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Bangladesh and Spain rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — export value?
- Bangladesh ranks 27th and Spain ranks 24th of 103 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf