Belarus vs Colombia: Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value over time
- Belarus
- Colombia
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 3,250 1000 USD against 2,160 1000 USD in Belarus, a difference of 1,090 1000 USD.
That makes Colombia's figure about 1.5 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 37th and Colombia ranks 34th of 103 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Colombia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Colombia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9,285 1000 USD | 7,941 1000 USD | 1,344 1000 USD | Belarus |
| 2010s | 6,608 1000 USD | 2,916 1000 USD | 3,692 1000 USD | Belarus |
| 2020s | 2,862 1000 USD | 7,784 1000 USD | 4,922 1000 USD | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — export value, Belarus or Colombia?
- Colombia, at 3,250 1000 USD against 2,160 1000 USD in Belarus as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — export value between Belarus and Colombia?
- 1,090 1000 USD, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Colombia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2022.
- How do Belarus and Colombia rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — export value?
- Belarus ranks 37th and Colombia ranks 34th of 103 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf