Belarus vs Sweden: Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value over time
- Belarus
- Sweden
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 2,160 1000 USD against 1,344 1000 USD in Sweden, a difference of 816 1000 USD.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.6 times Sweden's.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 37th and Sweden ranks 40th of 103 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9,285 1000 USD | 610.62 1000 USD | 8,674 1000 USD | Belarus |
| 2010s | 6,608 1000 USD | 1,685 1000 USD | 4,923 1000 USD | Belarus |
| 2020s | 2,862 1000 USD | 1,106 1000 USD | 1,756 1000 USD | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — export value, Belarus or Sweden?
- Belarus, at 2,160 1000 USD against 1,344 1000 USD in Sweden as of 2022.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — export value between Belarus and Sweden?
- 816 1000 USD, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Sweden?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2022.
- How do Belarus and Sweden rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — export value?
- Belarus ranks 37th and Sweden ranks 40th of 103 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf