Belgium vs Slovakia: Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value over time
- Belgium
- Slovakia
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 49,991 1000 USD against 38,519 1000 USD in Slovakia, a difference of 11,472 1000 USD.
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.3 times Slovakia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 20th and Slovakia ranks 22nd of 103 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33,285 1000 USD | 8,787 1000 USD | 24,498 1000 USD | Belgium |
| 2010s | 35,615 1000 USD | 6,401 1000 USD | 29,214 1000 USD | Belgium |
| 2020s | 66,197 1000 USD | 18,779 1000 USD | 47,418 1000 USD | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — export value, Belgium or Slovakia?
- Belgium, at 49,991 1000 USD against 38,519 1000 USD in Slovakia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — export value between Belgium and Slovakia?
- 11,472 1000 USD, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Slovakia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Slovakia rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — export value?
- Belgium ranks 20th and Slovakia ranks 22nd of 103 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf