Brazil vs Guatemala: Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value over time
- Brazil
- Guatemala
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 611.02 1000 USD against 405.8 1000 USD in Brazil, a difference of 205.22 1000 USD.
That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.5 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Guatemala ahead.
Brazil ranks 50th and Guatemala ranks 47th of 97 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,752 1000 USD | 184.49 1000 USD | 2,568 1000 USD | Brazil |
| 2010s | 13,453 1000 USD | 819.13 1000 USD | 12,634 1000 USD | Brazil |
| 2020s | 33,367 1000 USD | 931.27 1000 USD | 32,436 1000 USD | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — export value, Brazil or Guatemala?
- Guatemala, at 611.02 1000 USD against 405.8 1000 USD in Brazil as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — export value between Brazil and Guatemala?
- 205.22 1000 USD, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Guatemala?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Brazil and Guatemala rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — export value?
- Brazil ranks 50th and Guatemala ranks 47th of 97 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf