Chile vs Romania: Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value over time
- Chile
- Romania
How they compare
Chile currently reports 683.22 1000 USD against 418.78 1000 USD in Romania, a difference of 264.44 1000 USD.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.6 times Romania's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Romania ahead.
Chile ranks 46th and Romania ranks 49th of 97 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 757.84 1000 USD | 2,906 1000 USD | 2,148 1000 USD | Romania |
| 2010s | 350.43 1000 USD | 6,292 1000 USD | 5,942 1000 USD | Romania |
| 2020s | 751.83 1000 USD | 542.1 1000 USD | 209.73 1000 USD | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — export value, Chile or Romania?
- Chile, at 683.22 1000 USD against 418.78 1000 USD in Romania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — export value between Chile and Romania?
- 264.44 1000 USD, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Romania?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Romania rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — export value?
- Chile ranks 46th and Romania ranks 49th of 97 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf