Chile vs Singapore: Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value over time
- Chile
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 777.31 1000 USD against 683.22 1000 USD in Chile, a difference of 94.09 1000 USD.
That makes Singapore's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Singapore ahead.
Chile ranks 47th and Singapore ranks 46th of 103 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Singapore in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 757.84 1000 USD | 147.45 1000 USD | 610.39 1000 USD | Chile |
| 2010s | 350.43 1000 USD | 527.8 1000 USD | 177.37 1000 USD | Singapore |
| 2020s | 751.83 1000 USD | 637.94 1000 USD | 113.89 1000 USD | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — export value, Chile or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 777.31 1000 USD against 683.22 1000 USD in Chile as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — export value between Chile and Singapore?
- 94.09 1000 USD, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Singapore?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Singapore rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — export value?
- Chile ranks 47th and Singapore ranks 46th of 103 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf