Colombia vs South Africa: Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value over time
- Colombia
- South Africa
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 3,250 1000 USD against 3,229 1000 USD in South Africa, a difference of 21 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Colombia ahead.
Colombia ranks 32nd and South Africa ranks 33rd of 97 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8,328 1000 USD | 2,709 1000 USD | 5,619 1000 USD | Colombia |
| 2010s | 3,877 1000 USD | 6,220 1000 USD | 2,343 1000 USD | South Africa |
| 2020s | 7,373 1000 USD | 8,280 1000 USD | 907.02 1000 USD | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — export value, Colombia or South Africa?
- Colombia, at 3,250 1000 USD against 3,229 1000 USD in South Africa as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — export value between Colombia and South Africa?
- 21 1000 USD, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and South Africa?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Colombia and South Africa rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — export value?
- Colombia ranks 32nd and South Africa ranks 33rd of 97 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf