Croatia vs Portugal: Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value over time
- Croatia
- Portugal
How they compare
Portugal currently reports 11,817 1000 USD against 3,466 1000 USD in Croatia, a difference of 8,351 1000 USD.
That makes Portugal's figure about 3.4 times Croatia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Portugal ahead.
Croatia ranks 31st and Portugal ranks 28th of 97 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 1 and Portugal in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 96.21 1000 USD | 14,940 1000 USD | 14,844 1000 USD | Portugal |
| 2010s | 2,669 1000 USD | 106.17 1000 USD | 2,562 1000 USD | Croatia |
| 2020s | 3,014 1000 USD | 20,371 1000 USD | 17,357 1000 USD | Portugal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — export value, Croatia or Portugal?
- Portugal, at 11,817 1000 USD against 3,466 1000 USD in Croatia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — export value between Croatia and Portugal?
- 8,351 1000 USD, with Portugal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Portugal?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Croatia and Portugal rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — export value?
- Croatia ranks 31st and Portugal ranks 28th of 97 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf