Czechia vs Portugal: Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value over time
- Czechia
- Portugal
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 14,187 1000 USD against 11,817 1000 USD in Portugal, a difference of 2,370 1000 USD.
That makes Czechia's figure about 1.2 times Portugal's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Portugal ahead.
Czechia ranks 28th and Portugal ranks 29th of 103 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 1 and Portugal in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4,210 1000 USD | 14,940 1000 USD | 10,731 1000 USD | Portugal |
| 2010s | 6,780 1000 USD | 106.17 1000 USD | 6,674 1000 USD | Czechia |
| 2020s | 16,930 1000 USD | 20,371 1000 USD | 3,441 1000 USD | Portugal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — export value, Czechia or Portugal?
- Czechia, at 14,187 1000 USD against 11,817 1000 USD in Portugal as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — export value between Czechia and Portugal?
- 2,370 1000 USD, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Portugal?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Czechia and Portugal rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — export value?
- Czechia ranks 28th and Portugal ranks 29th of 103 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf