European Union (27) (excluding intra-trade) vs Libya: Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value over time
- European Union (27) (excluding intra-trade)
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports 200,765 1000 USD against 78,518 1000 USD in European Union (27) (excluding intra-trade), a difference of 122,247 1000 USD.
That makes Libya's figure about 2.6 times European Union (27) (excluding intra-trade)'s.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2020 it was European Union (27) (excluding intra-trade) ahead.
European Union (27) (excluding intra-trade) ranks 14th and Libya ranks 12th of 31 groups.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — export value, European Union (27) (excluding intra-trade) or Libya?
- Libya, at 200,765 1000 USD against 78,518 1000 USD in European Union (27) (excluding intra-trade) as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — export value between European Union (27) (excluding intra-trade) and Libya?
- 122,247 1000 USD, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for European Union (27) (excluding intra-trade) and Libya?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2020 to 2024.
- How do European Union (27) (excluding intra-trade) and Libya rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — export value?
- European Union (27) (excluding intra-trade) ranks 14th and Libya ranks 12th of 31 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf