Georgia vs Uzbekistan: Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value over time
- Georgia
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 81.3 1000 USD against 75.73 1000 USD in Georgia, a difference of 5.57 1000 USD.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.1 times Georgia's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.
Georgia ranks 63rd and Uzbekistan ranks 62nd of 103 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 417.59 1000 USD | 2,429 1000 USD | 2,011 1000 USD | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 124.41 1000 USD | 4,251 1000 USD | 4,127 1000 USD | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 55.1 1000 USD | 498.62 1000 USD | 443.52 1000 USD | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — export value, Georgia or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 81.3 1000 USD against 75.73 1000 USD in Georgia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — export value between Georgia and Uzbekistan?
- 5.57 1000 USD, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Uzbekistan?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Georgia and Uzbekistan rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — export value?
- Georgia ranks 63rd and Uzbekistan ranks 62nd of 103 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf