Ireland vs Lithuania: Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value over time
- Ireland
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 205.27 1000 USD against 120.06 1000 USD in Ireland, a difference of 85.21 1000 USD.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.7 times Ireland's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Ireland ahead.
Ireland ranks 58th and Lithuania ranks 57th of 103 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ireland | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,570 1000 USD | 8,511 1000 USD | 5,941 1000 USD | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 45.94 1000 USD | 2,024 1000 USD | 1,978 1000 USD | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 115.69 1000 USD | 446.3 1000 USD | 330.61 1000 USD | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — export value, Ireland or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 205.27 1000 USD against 120.06 1000 USD in Ireland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — export value between Ireland and Lithuania?
- 85.21 1000 USD, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Lithuania?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Ireland and Lithuania rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — export value?
- Ireland ranks 58th and Lithuania ranks 57th of 103 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf