Italy vs Uzbekistan: Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value over time
- Italy
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Italy currently reports 116.28 1000 USD against 81.3 1000 USD in Uzbekistan, a difference of 34.98 1000 USD.
That makes Italy's figure about 1.4 times Uzbekistan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Italy ranks 59th and Uzbekistan ranks 62nd of 103 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83.08 1000 USD | 1,609 1000 USD | 1,526 1000 USD | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 84.43 1000 USD | 4,251 1000 USD | 4,167 1000 USD | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 87.45 1000 USD | 498.62 1000 USD | 411.17 1000 USD | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — export value, Italy or Uzbekistan?
- Italy, at 116.28 1000 USD against 81.3 1000 USD in Uzbekistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — export value between Italy and Uzbekistan?
- 34.98 1000 USD, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Uzbekistan?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Italy and Uzbekistan rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — export value?
- Italy ranks 59th and Uzbekistan ranks 62nd of 103 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf