Japan vs Singapore: Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value over time
- Japan
- Singapore
How they compare
Japan currently reports 891.61 1000 USD against 777.31 1000 USD in Singapore, a difference of 114.3 1000 USD.
That makes Japan's figure about 1.1 times Singapore's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 45th and Singapore ranks 46th of 103 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7,484 1000 USD | 147.45 1000 USD | 7,337 1000 USD | Japan |
| 2010s | 1,541 1000 USD | 527.8 1000 USD | 1,013 1000 USD | Japan |
| 2020s | 1,281 1000 USD | 637.94 1000 USD | 643.22 1000 USD | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — export value, Japan or Singapore?
- Japan, at 891.61 1000 USD against 777.31 1000 USD in Singapore as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — export value between Japan and Singapore?
- 114.3 1000 USD, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Singapore?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Japan and Singapore rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — export value?
- Japan ranks 45th and Singapore ranks 46th of 103 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf