Jordan vs Mauritius: Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value over time
- Jordan
- Mauritius
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 16.55 1000 USD against 14.86 1000 USD in Mauritius, a difference of 1.69 1000 USD.
That makes Jordan's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Mauritius ahead.
Jordan ranks 75th and Mauritius ranks 78th of 103 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 2 and Mauritius in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.59 1000 USD | 32.25 1000 USD | 21.67 1000 USD | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 46.78 1000 USD | 28.47 1000 USD | 18.32 1000 USD | Jordan |
| 2020s | 40.22 1000 USD | 8.08 1000 USD | 32.14 1000 USD | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — export value, Jordan or Mauritius?
- Jordan, at 16.55 1000 USD against 14.86 1000 USD in Mauritius as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — export value between Jordan and Mauritius?
- 1.69 1000 USD, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Mauritius?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Jordan and Mauritius rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — export value?
- Jordan ranks 75th and Mauritius ranks 78th of 103 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf