Latvia vs New Zealand: Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value over time
- Latvia
- New Zealand
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 41.61 1000 USD against 33.55 1000 USD in New Zealand, a difference of 8.06 1000 USD.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.2 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 65th and New Zealand ranks 66th of 97 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41,618 1000 USD | 16.13 1000 USD | 41,601 1000 USD | Latvia |
| 2010s | 1,642 1000 USD | 7.88 1000 USD | 1,634 1000 USD | Latvia |
| 2020s | 41.46 1000 USD | 7.42 1000 USD | 34.04 1000 USD | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — export value, Latvia or New Zealand?
- Latvia, at 41.61 1000 USD against 33.55 1000 USD in New Zealand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — export value between Latvia and New Zealand?
- 8.06 1000 USD, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and New Zealand?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and New Zealand rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — export value?
- Latvia ranks 65th and New Zealand ranks 66th of 97 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf