Latvia vs Senegal: Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value over time
- Latvia
- Senegal
How they compare
Senegal currently reports 44.51 1000 USD against 41.61 1000 USD in Latvia, a difference of 2.9 1000 USD.
That makes Senegal's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Senegal ahead.
Latvia ranks 65th and Senegal ranks 64th of 97 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37,843 1000 USD | 193.76 1000 USD | 37,649 1000 USD | Latvia |
| 2010s | 1,921 1000 USD | 26.79 1000 USD | 1,894 1000 USD | Latvia |
| 2020s | 38.15 1000 USD | 28.61 1000 USD | 9.54 1000 USD | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — export value, Latvia or Senegal?
- Senegal, at 44.51 1000 USD against 41.61 1000 USD in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — export value between Latvia and Senegal?
- 2.9 1000 USD, with Senegal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Senegal?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Senegal rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — export value?
- Latvia ranks 65th and Senegal ranks 64th of 97 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf