Nigeria vs Uzbekistan: Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value over time
- Nigeria
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Nigeria currently reports 106.75 1000 USD against 81.3 1000 USD in Uzbekistan, a difference of 25.45 1000 USD.
That makes Nigeria's figure about 1.3 times Uzbekistan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Nigeria ahead.
Nigeria ranks 61st and Uzbekistan ranks 62nd of 103 countries.
Nigeria has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nigeria | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3,508 1000 USD | 1,749 1000 USD | 1,759 1000 USD | Nigeria |
| 2010s | 39,477 1000 USD | 4,156 1000 USD | 35,321 1000 USD | Nigeria |
| 2020s | 106.75 1000 USD | 81.3 1000 USD | 25.45 1000 USD | Nigeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — export value, Nigeria or Uzbekistan?
- Nigeria, at 106.75 1000 USD against 81.3 1000 USD in Uzbekistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — export value between Nigeria and Uzbekistan?
- 25.45 1000 USD, with Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Uzbekistan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2024.
- How do Nigeria and Uzbekistan rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — export value?
- Nigeria ranks 61st and Uzbekistan ranks 62nd of 103 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf