Antigua and Barbuda vs Chad: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Chad
How they compare
Chad currently reports 4.76 t against 3.72 t in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 1.04 t.
That makes Chad's figure about 1.3 times Antigua and Barbuda's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Chad ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 144th and Chad ranks 141st of 177 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 1 and Chad in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Chad | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.7 t | 3.57 t | 1.87 t | Chad |
| 2010s | 7.28 t | 15.9 t | 8.62 t | Chad |
| 2020s | 3.65 t | 2.65 t | 1 t | Antigua and Barbuda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity, Antigua and Barbuda or Chad?
- Chad, at 4.76 t against 3.72 t in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity between Antigua and Barbuda and Chad?
- 1.04 t, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Chad?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Chad rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 144th and Chad ranks 141st of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf