Aruba vs Syrian Arab Republic: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity

Aruba
2.42 t
in 2023
Syrian Arab Republic
2.5 t
in 2018
Aruba rank
160th
Syrian Arab Republic rank
157th

Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity over time

  • Aruba
  • Syrian Arab Republic
01020304050200320132023

How they compare

Syrian Arab Republic currently reports 2.5 t against 2.42 t in Aruba, a difference of 0.08 t.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Aruba ahead.

Aruba ranks 160th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 157th of 189 countries.

Syrian Arab Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity, Aruba or Syrian Arab Republic?
Syrian Arab Republic, at 2.5 t against 2.42 t in Aruba as of 2018.
What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity between Aruba and Syrian Arab Republic?
0.08 t, with Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Syrian Arab Republic?
6 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2018.
How do Aruba and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity?
Aruba ranks 160th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 157th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
221 places, 4,328 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf