Australia vs Côte d'Ivoire: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity over time
- Australia
- Côte d'Ivoire
How they compare
Australia currently reports 48,989 t against 36.4 t in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 48,953 t.
That makes Australia's figure about 1,345.9 times Côte d'Ivoire's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 34th and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 31st of 177 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Côte d'Ivoire | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80,663 t | 330.76 t | 80,332 t | Australia |
| 2010s | 80,079 t | 74.21 t | 80,005 t | Australia |
| 2020s | 71,381 t | 37.29 t | 71,343 t | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity, Australia or Côte d'Ivoire?
- Australia, at 48,989 t against 36.4 t in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity between Australia and Côte d'Ivoire?
- 48,953 t, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Côte d'Ivoire?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Australia and Côte d'Ivoire rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity?
- Australia ranks 34th and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 31st of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf