Austria vs Madagascar: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity over time
- Austria
- Madagascar
How they compare
Austria currently reports 29,394 t against 18,027 t in Madagascar, a difference of 11,367 t.
That makes Austria's figure about 1.6 times Madagascar's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 37th and Madagascar ranks 40th of 189 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 1 and Madagascar in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11,430 t | 6.21 t | 11,424 t | Austria |
| 2010s | 14,275 t | 26,487 t | 12,212 t | Madagascar |
| 2020s | 12,355 t | 25,813 t | 13,458 t | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity, Austria or Madagascar?
- Austria, at 29,394 t against 18,027 t in Madagascar as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity between Austria and Madagascar?
- 11,367 t, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Madagascar?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Austria and Madagascar rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity?
- Austria ranks 37th and Madagascar ranks 40th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf