Bahrain vs Solomon Islands: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity over time
- Bahrain
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 54.1 t against 39.78 t in Bahrain, a difference of 14.32 t.
That makes Solomon Islands's figure about 1.4 times Bahrain's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Bahrain ahead.
Bahrain ranks 103rd and Solomon Islands ranks 100th of 177 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bahrain averaged higher in 2 and Solomon Islands in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahrain | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 32.31 t | 12.86 t | 19.46 t | Bahrain |
| 2010s | 67.61 t | 156.5 t | 88.88 t | Solomon Islands |
| 2020s | 116.06 t | 31.2 t | 84.86 t | Bahrain |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity, Bahrain or Solomon Islands?
- Solomon Islands, at 54.1 t against 39.78 t in Bahrain as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity between Bahrain and Solomon Islands?
- 14.32 t, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahrain and Solomon Islands?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2023.
- How do Bahrain and Solomon Islands rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity?
- Bahrain ranks 103rd and Solomon Islands ranks 100th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf