Bangladesh vs Nicaragua: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity over time
- Bangladesh
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 0.07 t against 0.05 t in Bangladesh, a difference of 0.02 t.
That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.4 times Bangladesh's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 185th and Nicaragua ranks 184th of 189 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 2 and Nicaragua in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.88 t | 187.54 t | 155.66 t | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 97,339 t | 91.41 t | 97,248 t | Bangladesh |
| 2020s | 174,559 t | 70.22 t | 174,489 t | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity, Bangladesh or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 0.07 t against 0.05 t in Bangladesh as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity between Bangladesh and Nicaragua?
- 0.02 t, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Nicaragua?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Bangladesh and Nicaragua rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity?
- Bangladesh ranks 185th and Nicaragua ranks 184th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf