Barbados vs Luxembourg: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity over time
- Barbados
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 8.34 t against 6.01 t in Luxembourg, a difference of 2.33 t.
That makes Barbados's figure about 1.4 times Luxembourg's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Barbados ranks 139th and Luxembourg ranks 142nd of 189 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11.76 t | 133.13 t | 121.37 t | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 7.2 t | 39.48 t | 32.27 t | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 2.39 t | 12.13 t | 9.73 t | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity, Barbados or Luxembourg?
- Barbados, at 8.34 t against 6.01 t in Luxembourg as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity between Barbados and Luxembourg?
- 2.33 t, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Luxembourg?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Barbados and Luxembourg rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity?
- Barbados ranks 139th and Luxembourg ranks 142nd of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf