Burkina Faso vs Eswatini: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity over time
- Burkina Faso
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 1.5 t against 1.19 t in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0.31 t.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.3 times Burkina Faso's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Eswatini ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 161st and Eswatini ranks 158th of 177 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9.75 t | 207.04 t | 197.29 t | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 6.06 t | 61.23 t | 55.17 t | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 1.37 t | 1.41 t | 0.04 t | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity, Burkina Faso or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 1.5 t against 1.19 t in Burkina Faso as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity between Burkina Faso and Eswatini?
- 0.31 t, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Eswatini?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Burkina Faso and Eswatini rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity?
- Burkina Faso ranks 161st and Eswatini ranks 158th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf