Burkina Faso vs Montenegro: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity over time
- Burkina Faso
- Montenegro
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 1.19 t against 0.92 t in Montenegro, a difference of 0.27 t.
That makes Burkina Faso's figure about 1.3 times Montenegro's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Burkina Faso ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 161st and Montenegro ranks 164th of 177 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 2 and Montenegro in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11.58 t | 6.97 t | 4.61 t | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 6.06 t | 3.68 t | 2.38 t | Burkina Faso |
| 2020s | 1.37 t | 2.2 t | 0.8267 t | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity, Burkina Faso or Montenegro?
- Burkina Faso, at 1.19 t against 0.92 t in Montenegro as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity between Burkina Faso and Montenegro?
- 0.27 t, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Montenegro?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Burkina Faso and Montenegro rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity?
- Burkina Faso ranks 161st and Montenegro ranks 164th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf