Cambodia vs Saudi Arabia: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity over time
- Cambodia
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 646.81 t against 515.48 t in Cambodia, a difference of 131.33 t.
That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 1.3 times Cambodia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.
Cambodia ranks 61st and Saudi Arabia ranks 58th of 189 countries.
Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.52 t | 12 t | 11.48 t | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | 327.61 t | 409.88 t | 82.27 t | Saudi Arabia |
| 2020s | 411.59 t | 2,593 t | 2,182 t | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity, Cambodia or Saudi Arabia?
- Saudi Arabia, at 646.81 t against 515.48 t in Cambodia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity between Cambodia and Saudi Arabia?
- 131.33 t, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Saudi Arabia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2024.
- How do Cambodia and Saudi Arabia rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity?
- Cambodia ranks 61st and Saudi Arabia ranks 58th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf