Canada vs Madagascar: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity over time
- Canada
- Madagascar
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 18,027 t against 10,049 t in Canada, a difference of 7,978 t.
That makes Madagascar's figure about 1.8 times Canada's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Canada ahead.
Canada ranks 42nd and Madagascar ranks 39th of 177 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 1 and Madagascar in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17,102 t | 5.52 t | 17,096 t | Canada |
| 2010s | 11,252 t | 26,487 t | 15,235 t | Madagascar |
| 2020s | 7,324 t | 25,813 t | 18,488 t | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity, Canada or Madagascar?
- Madagascar, at 18,027 t against 10,049 t in Canada as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity between Canada and Madagascar?
- 7,978 t, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Madagascar?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Canada and Madagascar rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity?
- Canada ranks 42nd and Madagascar ranks 39th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf