Central African Republic vs Estonia: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity over time
- Central African Republic
- Estonia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 10.63 t against 10.5 t in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.13 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Estonia ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 125th and Estonia ranks 124th of 177 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.71 t | 18.69 t | 14.98 t | Estonia |
| 2010s | 4.41 t | 13.25 t | 8.84 t | Estonia |
| 2020s | 10.5 t | 13.73 t | 3.23 t | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity, Central African Republic or Estonia?
- Estonia, at 10.63 t against 10.5 t in Central African Republic as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity between Central African Republic and Estonia?
- 0.13 t, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Estonia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2021.
- How do Central African Republic and Estonia rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity?
- Central African Republic ranks 125th and Estonia ranks 124th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf