Chad vs Congo: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity

Chad
4.76 t
in 2023
Congo
4.95 t
in 2024
Chad rank
148th
Congo rank
145th

Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity over time

  • Chad
  • Congo
0204060200520142024

How they compare

Congo currently reports 4.95 t against 4.76 t in Chad, a difference of 0.19 t.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Congo ahead.

Chad ranks 148th and Congo ranks 145th of 189 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 1 and Congo in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Congo Difference Ahead
2000s 1.77 t 3.92 t 2.15 t Congo
2010s 15.9 t 8.45 t 7.46 t Chad
2020s 2.65 t 28.41 t 25.76 t Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity, Chad or Congo?
Congo, at 4.95 t against 4.76 t in Chad as of 2024.
What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity between Chad and Congo?
0.19 t, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Congo?
14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2023.
How do Chad and Congo rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity?
Chad ranks 148th and Congo ranks 145th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
221 places, 4,328 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf