Chad vs Malta: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity

Chad
4.76 t
in 2023
Malta
4.69 t
in 2024
Chad rank
148th
Malta rank
149th

Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity over time

  • Chad
  • Malta
0100200300200220132024

How they compare

Chad currently reports 4.76 t against 4.69 t in Malta, a difference of 0.07 t.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Chad ahead.

Chad ranks 148th and Malta ranks 149th of 189 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Malta Difference Ahead
2000s 3.47 t 4.46 t 0.985 t Malta
2010s 11.92 t 20.63 t 8.71 t Malta
2020s 2.65 t 2.33 t 0.325 t Chad

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity, Chad or Malta?
Chad, at 4.76 t against 4.69 t in Malta as of 2023.
What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity between Chad and Malta?
0.07 t, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Malta?
12 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Chad and Malta rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity?
Chad ranks 148th and Malta ranks 149th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
221 places, 4,328 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf