Chad vs Russian Federation: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity over time
- Chad
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Chad currently reports 4.76 t against 4 t in Russian Federation, a difference of 0.76 t.
That makes Chad's figure about 1.2 times Russian Federation's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Chad ranks 148th and Russian Federation ranks 150th of 189 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 1 and Russian Federation in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.97 t | 1,887 t | 1,884 t | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 15.9 t | 1,223 t | 1,207 t | Russian Federation |
| 2020s | 2.65 t | 2.13 t | 0.5225 t | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity, Chad or Russian Federation?
- Chad, at 4.76 t against 4 t in Russian Federation as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity between Chad and Russian Federation?
- 0.76 t, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Russian Federation?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Chad and Russian Federation rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity?
- Chad ranks 148th and Russian Federation ranks 150th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf