China, Hong Kong SAR vs Turkmenistan: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Turkmenistan currently reports 105.04 t against 104.54 t in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 0.5 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Turkmenistan ahead.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 84th and Turkmenistan ranks 83rd of 177 countries.
Turkmenistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Hong Kong SAR | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.04 t | 458.15 t | 450.11 t | Turkmenistan |
| 2010s | 35.16 t | 52.66 t | 17.5 t | Turkmenistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity, China, Hong Kong SAR or Turkmenistan?
- Turkmenistan, at 105.04 t against 104.54 t in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2018.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity between China, Hong Kong SAR and Turkmenistan?
- 0.5 t, with Turkmenistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Turkmenistan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2018.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Turkmenistan rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 84th and Turkmenistan ranks 83rd of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf