Colombia vs Kazakhstan: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity over time
- Colombia
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 79,449 t against 71,130 t in Kazakhstan, a difference of 8,319 t.
That makes Colombia's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Colombia ahead.
Colombia ranks 28th and Kazakhstan ranks 30th of 189 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 2 and Kazakhstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 64,001 t | 17,614 t | 46,387 t | Colombia |
| 2010s | 66,604 t | 19,221 t | 47,382 t | Colombia |
| 2020s | 55,678 t | 59,925 t | 4,248 t | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity, Colombia or Kazakhstan?
- Colombia, at 79,449 t against 71,130 t in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity between Colombia and Kazakhstan?
- 8,319 t, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Kazakhstan?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Colombia and Kazakhstan rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity?
- Colombia ranks 28th and Kazakhstan ranks 30th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf