Congo vs Niger: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity

Congo
4.95 t
in 2024
Niger
4.8 t
in 2023
Congo rank
145th
Niger rank
147th

Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity over time

  • Congo
  • Niger
0204060200220132024

How they compare

Congo currently reports 4.95 t against 4.8 t in Niger, a difference of 0.15 t.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 145th and Niger ranks 147th of 189 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Niger Difference Ahead
2000s 6.28 t 0.97 t 5.31 t Congo
2010s 3.75 t 0.28 t 3.46 t Congo
2020s 33.06 t 2.6 t 30.46 t Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity, Congo or Niger?
Congo, at 4.95 t against 4.8 t in Niger as of 2024.
What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity between Congo and Niger?
0.15 t, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Niger?
7 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2023.
How do Congo and Niger rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity?
Congo ranks 145th and Niger ranks 147th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
221 places, 4,328 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf