Côte d'Ivoire vs Iceland: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Iceland
How they compare
Côte d'Ivoire currently reports 36.4 t against 32.45 t in Iceland, a difference of 3.95 t.
That makes Côte d'Ivoire's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 111th and Iceland ranks 114th of 189 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Côte d'Ivoire averaged higher in 1 and Iceland in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 330.76 t | 146.15 t | 184.62 t | Côte d'Ivoire |
| 2010s | 74.21 t | 92.27 t | 18.06 t | Iceland |
| 2020s | 37.29 t | 76.66 t | 39.37 t | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity, Côte d'Ivoire or Iceland?
- Côte d'Ivoire, at 36.4 t against 32.45 t in Iceland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity between Côte d'Ivoire and Iceland?
- 3.95 t, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Iceland?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Iceland rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 111th and Iceland ranks 114th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf