Côte d'Ivoire vs Mongolia: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 39.55 t against 36.4 t in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 3.15 t.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Côte d'Ivoire's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 111th and Mongolia ranks 110th of 189 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Côte d'Ivoire averaged higher in 2 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 407.86 t | 37.49 t | 370.37 t | Côte d'Ivoire |
| 2010s | 88.48 t | 33.88 t | 54.61 t | Côte d'Ivoire |
| 2020s | 23.73 t | 42.12 t | 18.4 t | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity, Côte d'Ivoire or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 39.55 t against 36.4 t in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2022.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity between Côte d'Ivoire and Mongolia?
- 3.15 t, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Mongolia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2022.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Mongolia rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 111th and Mongolia ranks 110th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf