Djibouti vs Equatorial Guinea: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity over time
- Djibouti
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Djibouti currently reports 5.4 t against 4.82 t in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.58 t.
That makes Djibouti's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Djibouti ahead.
Djibouti ranks 143rd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 146th of 189 countries.
Djibouti has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.95 t | 0.85 t | 12.1 t | Djibouti |
| 2010s | 7.45 t | 1.39 t | 6.06 t | Djibouti |
| 2020s | 13.02 t | 4.82 t | 8.2 t | Djibouti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity, Djibouti or Equatorial Guinea?
- Djibouti, at 5.4 t against 4.82 t in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity between Djibouti and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0.58 t, with Djibouti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Equatorial Guinea?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2022.
- How do Djibouti and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity?
- Djibouti ranks 143rd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 146th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf