Djibouti vs Luxembourg: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity over time
- Djibouti
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 6.01 t against 5.4 t in Djibouti, a difference of 0.61 t.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.1 times Djibouti's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Djibouti ranks 143rd and Luxembourg ranks 142nd of 189 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Djibouti averaged higher in 1 and Luxembourg in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.19 t | 165.23 t | 157.04 t | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 9,863 t | 39.48 t | 9,823 t | Djibouti |
| 2020s | 10.89 t | 17.31 t | 6.41 t | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity, Djibouti or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 6.01 t against 5.4 t in Djibouti as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity between Djibouti and Luxembourg?
- 0.61 t, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Luxembourg?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Djibouti and Luxembourg rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity?
- Djibouti ranks 143rd and Luxembourg ranks 142nd of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf