Dominican Republic vs Turkmenistan: Ammonia, anhydrous β Import quantity
Ammonia, anhydrous β Import quantity over time
- Dominican Republic
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 106.74 t against 105.04 t in Turkmenistan, a difference of 1.7 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Turkmenistan ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 82nd and Turkmenistan ranks 83rd of 177 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and Turkmenistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 165.96 t | 458.15 t | 292.19 t | Turkmenistan |
| 2010s | 177.04 t | 52.66 t | 124.38 t | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous β import quantity, Dominican Republic or Turkmenistan?
- Dominican Republic, at 106.74 t against 105.04 t in Turkmenistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous β import quantity between Dominican Republic and Turkmenistan?
- 1.7 t, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Turkmenistan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2018.
- How do Dominican Republic and Turkmenistan rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous β import quantity?
- Dominican Republic ranks 82nd and Turkmenistan ranks 83rd of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous β Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf