Ecuador vs Latvia: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity over time
- Ecuador
- Latvia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 453.29 t against 411.56 t in Latvia, a difference of 41.73 t.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 62nd and Latvia ranks 63rd of 177 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 398.24 t | 54,809 t | 54,411 t | Latvia |
| 2010s | 508.94 t | 1,499 t | 990.53 t | Latvia |
| 2020s | 592.31 t | 103.39 t | 488.91 t | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity, Ecuador or Latvia?
- Ecuador, at 453.29 t against 411.56 t in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity between Ecuador and Latvia?
- 41.73 t, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Latvia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Latvia rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity?
- Ecuador ranks 62nd and Latvia ranks 63rd of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf