Ecuador vs Sri Lanka: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity over time
- Ecuador
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 537.71 t against 453.29 t in Ecuador, a difference of 84.42 t.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.2 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Ecuador ranks 62nd and Sri Lanka ranks 59th of 177 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 398.24 t | 182.88 t | 215.35 t | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 508.94 t | 610.28 t | 101.35 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 592.31 t | 606.87 t | 14.57 t | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity, Ecuador or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 537.71 t against 453.29 t in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity between Ecuador and Sri Lanka?
- 84.42 t, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Sri Lanka?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Sri Lanka rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity?
- Ecuador ranks 62nd and Sri Lanka ranks 59th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf