El Salvador vs Switzerland: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity over time
- El Salvador
- Switzerland
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 2,629 t against 1,240 t in Switzerland, a difference of 1,389 t.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 2.1 times Switzerland's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Switzerland ahead.
El Salvador ranks 52nd and Switzerland ranks 55th of 177 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and Switzerland in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,450 t | 3,375 t | 1,924 t | Switzerland |
| 2010s | 1,231 t | 2,536 t | 1,305 t | Switzerland |
| 2020s | 2,629 t | 1,371 t | 1,258 t | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity, El Salvador or Switzerland?
- El Salvador, at 2,629 t against 1,240 t in Switzerland as of 2021.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity between El Salvador and Switzerland?
- 1,389 t, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Switzerland?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2021.
- How do El Salvador and Switzerland rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity?
- El Salvador ranks 52nd and Switzerland ranks 55th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf