Equatorial Guinea vs Malta: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Malta
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 4.82 t against 4.69 t in Malta, a difference of 0.13 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Malta ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 139th and Malta ranks 142nd of 177 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.95 t | 136.31 t | 134.37 t | Malta |
| 2010s | 1.39 t | 19.96 t | 18.57 t | Malta |
| 2020s | 3 t | 2.92 t | 0.085 t | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity, Equatorial Guinea or Malta?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 4.82 t against 4.69 t in Malta as of 2022.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity between Equatorial Guinea and Malta?
- 0.13 t, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Malta?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2022.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Malta rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 139th and Malta ranks 142nd of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf