French Polynesia vs Uzbekistan: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity over time
- French Polynesia
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 0.24 t against 0.22 t in French Polynesia, a difference of 0.02 t.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.1 times French Polynesia's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.
French Polynesia ranks 182nd and Uzbekistan ranks 180th of 189 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | French Polynesia | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.1 t | 1.04 t | 0.94 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 0.01 t | 0.22 t | 0.21 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 0.1275 t | 9,173 t | 9,173 t | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity, French Polynesia or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 0.24 t against 0.22 t in French Polynesia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity between French Polynesia and Uzbekistan?
- 0.02 t, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Uzbekistan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
- How do French Polynesia and Uzbekistan rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity?
- French Polynesia ranks 182nd and Uzbekistan ranks 180th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf