Kyrgyzstan vs Mozambique: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Mozambique
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 9.92 t against 9.2 t in Mozambique, a difference of 0.72 t.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Mozambique's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 134th and Mozambique ranks 136th of 189 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 1 and Mozambique in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 454.94 t | 1,113 t | 658.36 t | Mozambique |
| 2010s | 373.94 t | 19.56 t | 354.38 t | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 20.2 t | 25.12 t | 4.92 t | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity, Kyrgyzstan or Mozambique?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 9.92 t against 9.2 t in Mozambique as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity between Kyrgyzstan and Mozambique?
- 0.72 t, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Mozambique?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Mozambique rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 134th and Mozambique ranks 136th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf